What If - About Character Development
![]() |
| Created in Canva by Pauline |
I’ve been watching one of the Masterclass.com classes. This one is on acting and is presented by Samuel L. Jackson. It is a behind-the-scenes look at what he, as an actor, thinks about as he’s getting ready to play a new character. He is also teaching some actors in the class about how he does it.
I am not an actor, yet, as a writer, I felt
compelled to sign up for this class because I do invent figures for stories. It’s
complicated because I also work with Spirit as a psychic channel. Spirit is in
my work, whether it is a conscious thing or a magical, helpful part of my team. Also, I like Samuel L. Jackson.
There are 21 lessons in the course, and I’ve only
done the first six. There is much more to come. I want to address one thing I am
learning from this class. That is what I’m thinking of as “What if?”
The exercise, as an actor and as a writer, is to think
about what if your character does something that is not included in the script?
How would they react to slipping on a sidewalk in front of a bunch of people
they are usually very business-like with? Or, what if they were faced with a
moral dilemma? This has teased away at part of me for a long time, when I think
about the characters I want to write about. The funny thing is, once I felt
they would leap fully formed from the pages of whatever book I was writing.
In truth, many of them have come to me via
Spirit. We’ve enjoyed conversations, but I’ve never gotten as far as creating a
fully fleshed-out character.
Somehow, all this time, I have been writing
personal essays and such. I’ve got a wealth of experience to draw on and still
manage to be truthful, what with being 70 years old and a psychic channel. And
a lifelong reader. Lifelong, from about the third grade, I suppose. That was
when I was given a social studies book where a family uprooted themselves,
moved West, and created a new town. The book was supposed to last us all year.
I read it over the weekend. My teacher was not pleased with me. However, that
is also the school where I took an advanced reading course. There was a machine
we looked at that guided our eyes from line to line.
As an adult, I knew that I read quickly, and once
I set out to discover just how quickly. I tested it twice (there are lots of
places online, just ask Google) and came up with a figure in the 600s. This is
when your eyes trace an S on the page, and you get it in one swoop. However,
this is not enjoyable reading. It is speed reading. I don’t do it often. I much
prefer to just read.
Okay, for purposes of research, I found a place
online called ReadingSoft.com. I didn’t
spend a whole lot of time looking for it. It was the second one listed when I Googled
it. I tested at 285 words a minute, which is an average speed. Of course, they
would sell you a program to increase your speed, but I’m not sure I really need
it right now. Oh, who am I kidding? Of course, it would be valuable to be able
to read and comprehend whatever material you are reading, especially if you
were in a class-like setting.
I do know there was a word that caught me up. My
eyes aren’t the greatest these days, and I am overdue for an eye test and new
glasses. My old glasses are full of scratches and pits that occlude whatever I
am reading. Anyway, the word in the reading selection was sprinter. I mistook
it for the word 'sphincter,' which threw me for a bit. I had to go back and
read it again just because I couldn’t believe my eyes. It just didn’t make sense.
I went back to watch the class for a minute just now and realized why I’ve been stilled upon Lesson six all this time. It’s because the character of Jules in Pulp Fiction, which is the character they are talking about right now, is both a bad person and a good person at the same time. This is something I’ve been tussling with for years. The change of heart that a person can experience in their life is absolutely fascinating to me. I may go back and watch this lesson again, probably for the third time. If you'd like to see the scene we've been talking about go to YouTube and put Ezekiel 25:17 Pulp Fiction in the search area. I was going to do it for you, but you know what? As a reader and very likely a writer yourself, you need to work for this. It's how one man goes about having a change of heart.
One of the things that Spirit has taught me is
that there is no Hell. There just isn’t. They did say that there are hot spots
in Heaven, which made me giggle. I think they were serious about it. People
continue learning after this lifetime is over. We reincarnate, and sometimes
what we continue working on are the lessons we never quite mastered in our
first lifetime. However, some lessons absolutely require more than one lifetime
to complete. The judging that goes on when you get to those pearly gates of
Heaven? That is, you and your spiritual teachers discussing things. Mostly, it
is you, now as your higher self, determining just how you did with input from
those spiritual advisors.
Then, you might remain in Heaven for 750 more
years to work on all of that or reincarnate to do some more work. It’s all sort
of hazy to me, even with this pat explanation. I remember once Seth, my Spirit
Guide, said they even let lawyers into Heaven.
So, whatever I write will include the moral dilemmas
that people face.
Thanks for reading. For your convenience or
curiosity, I’ve listed some other places where I’m active on the internet.
Love,
🌺 Pauline
Evanosky
🌺My Links:
The Best Stuff for Kids on YouTube
Just Passing Through on YouTube
Talking To Spirit on YouTube
Pauline Evanosky on Medium
Talking To Spirit on Substack
Talking To Spirit — my website
Pauline Evanosky — my author’s website
Facebook
My Table of Contents for
Medium — Updated Monthly
My Table of Contents for
Substack — Also Updated Monthly
References I recommend on your
path to more psychic awareness

Comments
Post a Comment